Thursday, October 27, 2011

Did the president get paid for his own books which he made state department buy?

Can you define corruption any better than this overt money laundering and theft of public funds?

These are all open questions, I don't have an answer right now - but I wish the media start posing those questions.

NBC Gives 23 Seconds to State Department Buying Up Obama Books; Devoted Full Story to Herman Cain Book Buying

On Thursday's NBC Today, White House correspondent Kristen Welker only managed to give 23 seconds to the State Department buying up $70,000 worth of President Obama's various books. However, on October 21, investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff offered a full report about Herman Cain's presidential campaign buying copies of the businessman's new book.

...
Not holding my breath to getting answers from this Pravda media.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

No, seriously, Sponge-Bob does fry your kids' brains, toddler's even more

This particular research goes further - any TV. To which I say - even my super expensive extra cool 65" Plasma?! Say it ain't so! And I thought it was the perfect baby sitter.

I personally insist - it's PBS and Teletabbis that do most damage...

It’s Official: To Protect Baby’s Brain, Turn Off TV

A decade ago, the American Academy of Pediatrics suggested that parents limit TV consumption by children under two years of age. The recommendations were based as much on common sense as science, because studies of media consumption and infant development were themselves in their infancy.

The research has finally grown up. And though it’s still ongoing, it’s mature enough for the AAP to release a new, science-heavy policy statement on babies watching television, videos or any other passive media form.

Their verdict: It’s not good, and probably bad.

Media, whether playing in the background or designed explicitly as an infant educational tool, “have potentially negative effects and no known positive effects for children younger than 2 years,” concluded the AAP’s report, released Oct. 18 at the Academy’s annual meeting in Boston and scheduled for November publication in the journal Pediatrics. “Although infant/toddler programming might be entertaining, it should not be marketed as or presumed by parents to be educational.”

...

Sunday, October 16, 2011

What the heck happened to Onion News Network?

Last Friday episode included the following items:

* Israel supposedly attacks US, 20,000 killed in Boston, US stands by Israel
* Obama punches investment banker in face, gains popularity
* Biden defecates on wall-street


In all the years I've been reading, watching, enjoying, laughing with the Onion, I've never seen them virtually promoting ideology as with last Friday's episode. And I don't think that I need to elaborate what kind of ideology considering these items. Almost anything can be excused on guise of sarcasm and trying to be funny. Almost. These three items - not so much.


Obama Seeks Approval Of 'Occupy Wall Street' Protestors By Punching Banker In The Face

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Post your TSA satire while its legal, congress wants to criminalize satire

Hey, good luck with that supreme court challenge along the way for breach of freedom of speech. Oh wait, I forgot, its the TSA - they pretty much took away many freedoms when created this entity and let them touch and feel you inappropriately as well as collect images of us naked.

House Bill Would Criminalize Satire of TSA

On September 22, 2011, H.R. 3011 was introduced in the House. It is entitled the “Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act of 2011” and it contains some curious language.
Two thirds of the way through the ponderous bill, in Sec. 295, we find the following:
Whoever, except with the written permission of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Security (or the Director of the Federal Air Marshal Service for issues involving the Federal Air Marshal Service), knowingly uses the words ‘Transportation Security Administration’, ‘United States Transportation Security Administration’, ‘Federal Air Marshal Service’, ‘United States Federal Air Marshal Service’, ‘Federal Air Marshals’, the initials ‘T.S.A.’, ‘F.A.M.S.’, ‘F.A.M.’, or any colorable imitation of such words or initials, or the likeness of a Transportation Security Administration or Federal Air Marshal Service badge, logo, or insignia on any item of apparel, in connection with any advertisement, circular, book, pamphlet, software, or other publication, or with any play, motion picture, broadcast, telecast, or other production, in a matter that is reasonably calculated to convey the impression that the wearer of the item of apparel is acting pursuant to the legal authority of the Transportation Security Administration or Federal Air Marshal Service, or to convey the impression that such advertisement, circular, book, pamphlet, software, or other publication, or such play, motion picture, broadcast, telecast, or other production, is approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Transportation Security Administration or Federal Air Marshal Service .(Emphasis added.)
In other words, if you print a t-shirt or produce a publication with a TSA logo, the government may soon be able to arrest and prosecute you.

Faced with hard evidence regarding Iranian plot, CNN says they're skeptic

CNN, trusts Iranians more than their own government. You know, the good Iranian guys who fund Hezbollah, blow up Jewish targets in Argentina, kidnap Americans for decades, supports insurgents against US in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those Iranians, the CNN crew thinks "why - that doesn't make sense".

5 reasons to be skeptical of allegations
How nice of CNN to later change the headline to :"Some analysts skeptical of alleged Iranian plot". I haven't read the content before they changed the headline, but it still has those 5 reasons and names a former CIA skeptic.

One of the reasoning they posted says: "Iran would lose more than it would gain". Because you know you are dealing with rational people who are always thinking in those terms... except when they develop nukes, defy international community, bombard Jewish targets in Argentina, murder exiled Iranians across Europe... Yep, CNN is skeptic.

Friday, October 14, 2011

We certainly do live in interesting times: Super Hero interviewed, marxists in NYC, nobel peace winning president sends US troops to Libya and Uganda

Megyn Kelly interviews this weird guy, who is weird not for what he did - but for wearing that suit. Yea - I saw "kick ass", and the message was "don't be stupid". As well as don't trust McLovin'...



H/T to "The Right Scoop"

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

How much are OWS supporting celebreties worth?

How about spreading their wealth first... especially those who are supposedly public servant - how the heck did Pelosi become so wealthy?!


The Ten Richest Celebrities Supporting Wall Street Protests


#1 Yoko Ono Net Worth - $500 million.
Ono stated “I love ‘Occupy Wall Street’! John is sending his smile to ‘Occupy Wall Street’. I am sending my love to ‘Occupy Wall Street’. We are all working together. ”
#2 Russell Simmons Net Worth - $325 million
Keep in mind that on top of being a hip-hop mogul Simmons is the founder of a high fee credit card company called UniRush Financial Services.
#3 Roseanne Barr Net Worth - $80 million
Roseanne thinks anyone with over $100 million should be beheaded. Interesting that her net worth is $80 million. I guess she doesnt make “the cut”.
#4 Deepak Chopra Net Worth - $80 million
Chopra said #OWS is turning anger into awareness. The fortune he has made off his fluff filled books has just turned me to anger.
#5 Kanye West Net Worth - $70 million
#6 Alec Baldwin Net Worth - $65 million
#7 Susan Sarandon Net Worth - $50 million
#8 Michael Moore Net Worth - $50 million
#9 Tim Robbins Net Worth - $50 million
#10 Nancy Pelosi Net Worth - $35.5 million
Decapitator and re-educator Rosanne Barr - dirty money grabbing capitalist. Apparently. Hey, thanks NBC for hiring this scumbag once more!
NBC Gives Roseanne Behead-the-Rich Barr New Sitcom About Mobile Home Life

Friday, October 7, 2011

Great pic; Communists occupying Wall Street agree: DOWN WITH EVIL CORPORATIONS!

Via powerline:



Not surprising, there are visible links between these communist numb sculls and this Orwellian big brother administration:

Video Exposing How ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Was Organized From Day One by SEIU/ACORN Front – The Working Family Party, and How They All Tie to the Obama Administration, DNC, Democratic Socialists of America, Tides and George Soros (The Blaze)


So it is now clear, Obama is sending out communist activists demanding a revolution and tear down of the capitalist system. Any more question regarding who is the current commander and chief?

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

LOL: BHO BLR

Saw part of it first on Fox News, literally roll on the floor, laughing.

Speaking of really funny web videos, how about winning?

Monday, October 3, 2011

Breitbart does it again: Photos of Obama with Malik Shabazz the media doesn't care to report about

Guess what else the nation didn't know about "The One" before his election selection.

Direct connection between the president and those whose charges of voter intimidation charges were dropped... not that this criminally biased media cares to report. No, the media instead tries every dirty trick to smear Texas Governor Rick Perry with racism. Despicable.

Shock Photos: Candidate Obama Appeared And Marched With New Black Panther Party in 2007 (Andrew Breitbart)